“The real cause and motive behind the barbaric incident could not be established beyond doubt.” “The committee feels that further investigation is required to unearth the real cause behind the incident. The negative attitude among the general BDR members towards the army officers, and their discontent over unfulfilled demands may be identified as the primary cause of the mutiny. Analysis of these demands give the impression that such small demands can not be the main cause of such a heinous incident. These points have been used to influence the general BDR soldiers. The main conspirators may have used these causes to instigate this incident, they themselves working from behind curtains to destabilise the nation.”
Friday, May 29, 2009
A summary of the national probe report on the BDR mutiny
Formation of the enquiry committee and its scope
1. The enquiry committee formed with former secretary Anis-uz-Zaman as its chairman and comprising of 12 members started its work with the responsibility of unearthing the background and cause of the BDR mutiny at Pilkhana on February 25 and 26, other related matters and make recommendations.
2. The enquiry committee visited the BDR headquarters and related installations and recorded statements of 107 people, including army officials and BDR members present at Pilkhana during the incident, members of the families of the army men, arrested rebel and detained, local civilians, media personalities, former Director General of BDR, politicians, chiefs of different forces and agencies, ministers and lawmakers. The Committee collected information (as far as possible) from different intelligence agencies and investigating agencies on the planning of the mutiny, its cause and motive, discontent in BDR and Daal Bhat programme.
Background of the rebellion
3. The mentality of not accepting authority of the army had been dormant among the BDR members for long. They had been demanding appointment of their own officers under a system as the BCS cadre, increase of border allowance, 100 per cent ration allowance, sending them to the UN Mission, restructuring of their salary structure in a similar model as that of the army. Besides, the Daal-bhat programme, punishment of sepoys, lack of transparency in running BDR shops, luxurious lifestyle of officials, corruption in running the schools etc gave rise to questions and discontent among the BDR men. They circulated leaflets at different times with the aim of venting their discontent and realising their demands. BDR authorities at different times took initiatives to solve the problems through raising some logical demands to the government.
Plan for rebellion and earlier attempts
4. A group of BDR members started getting organised over these demands centring the national election and tried to meet with different political figures. They became restless after failing to get expected response from the political personalities. In this background they held a number of secret meetings at different places with the aim of taking up action regarding their demands. They also planned to hold army officers, including the director general of BDR, as hostages in the Darbar on February 25. To implement the plan they decided to loot the armoury and take control of different important instillations including different entrances to the BDR headquarters.
Common soldiers thought that the soldiers would take up a stance in the darbar to realise their demands. But they did not have any idea about the real nature of the stand. Only a handful of hardcore mutineers knew about the plan to kill BDR director general and other army officers working with the BDR and other heinous activities.
Those who led the mutiny
5. Among the planners of the mutiny and those who lead it were: DAD Touhid, DAD Habib, DAD Jalil, DAD Nasir, DAD Rahim, Subedar Major Gofran, Nayek subedar Monoranjan, Habildar Assistant Moniruzzaman, sepoy Selim Reza, sepoy Tarek, sepoy Ayub, sepoy Kajal, sepoy Sahabuddin, sepoy Mainuddin, sepoy Rezaul, sepoy Rubel, sepoy Habib, sepoy Muhit, sepoy Nizam, sepoy Shahadat, Lance Nayek assistant Saidur, Ln nayek assistant Lutfor, Ln nayek Zakaria, sepoy Obaed etc.
Distribution of responsibility and start of mutiny
6. In the final meeting held on February 24 night the rebels distributed responsibility among themselves. As per the plan, some rebels of Rifle battalions 13, 24, 36 and 44 took control of gate nos 1, 3, 4 and respectively by 8 am and started looting the central armoury.
When the DG was delivering his address at the Darbar Hall at around 9:27 am two rebels (sepoy Mainuddin and sepoy Kajal) suddenly got on the stage. Sepoy Mainuddin was carrying arms. He aimed his arms at the DG. At that time a blank shot was fired outside which the rebels took as a signal to start the mutiny. Simultaneously some rebels present at the Darbar Hall shouted “Run!” and signaled the soldiers to leave the Darbar.
Afterwards, to instigate soldiers against the army officers throughout the country, outside Darbar Hall at the Pilkhana and later over mobile phones, wireless/walkie talkie, news was spread that officers had shot dead a BDR member at the Darbar Hall. Indiscriminate firing in and around the Darbar Hall started. About 40 army officers got stranded inside the Darbar Hall, others managed to flee. Most of those stranded in the hall were brutally killed.
Government attempt at peaceful solution
7. From the beginning of the mutiny, the government stressed on solving the prevailing problem through dialogue. Alongside, preparations were also taken for an army raid if necessary. In order to not let the visible presence of the army become an obstacle to the ongoing dialogue, the armed forces were told to take up their positions at a safe distance. In the meantime the prime minister handed the responsibility of bringing the rebels to talks to state minister Jahangir Kabir Nanak and whip Mirza Azam. By noon they took initiatives to establish contact with the rebels at Pilkhana gate no 4. At 3:30 pm they took a 14-member team of the rebels led by DAD Touhid to the prime minister’s official residence Jamuna for dialogue with the PM. After a two hour-long discussion, the rebels agreed to lay down their arms and return to the barracks and release all hostages and on these terms, they were given assurance that their demands would be met in phases and a general amnesty was announced.
8. After returning to Pilkhana a difference of opinions arose among the rebels regarding surrender of arms. As a result the decision taken at Jamuna was not implemented. Later from 8:00 pm, a second round of talks between a government team, led by the home minister, and the rebels was held at Hotel Ambala Inn in front of Pilkhana’s gate no 4. A series of meetings were held with different groups of the mutineers and their demands also changed. The mutineers prolonged the talks to facilitate the shifting of bodies, digging of mass graves, fleeing of BDR men from Pilkhana and looting in the cover of the night. In continuation of the talks, at around 1:00 am the home minister, the state minister for law and the IGP entered the Pilkhana premises. Another round of talks was held there and then at 3:00 am the rebels surrendered some arms to the home minister. But after her departure, they took up arms again. By early morning the home minister rescued 15 families being held hostage and brought them out from Pilkhana.
9. Different political leaders came to Pilkhana gate no 4 on February 26 morning They included minister Matia Chowdhury, state ministers Nanak, Qamrul Islam, whip Mirza Azam, MPs HM Ershad, Tapash, Asaduzzaman Noor, Golam Reza, Segufta Yasmin and Mahbub Ara Gini.
Grand alliance leaders Abdul Jalil, MPs Abdur Razzak, Rashed Khan Menon, Hasanul Haq Inu, Sheikh Selim, Mainuddin Khan Badal, Anisul Islam Mahmud, Nurul Islam BSC and Ziauddin Bablu arrived by noon.
Processions around Pilkhana
10. On February 25 and 26, some processions were brought out around Pilkhana area in support of the mutineers. Residents of Azimpur, Hazaribagh and New Market area participated in these processions. They chanted different slogans in support of the BDR men.
Media’s negative role
11. From the start of the incident, private TV channels spread the news of the mutiny at home and abroad through live telecasts. In doing so, they gave preference to the commercial aspects pf the situation over the national security. Where different intelligence agencies, the army and the government itself could not get details form inside the Pilkhana, mutineers in Dhaka and outside of Dhaka were able to get detailed news regarding the position of army and other on goings inside the Pilkhana thanks to the media. In general, the media encouraged the mutineers by publicising the news about the mutiny, and talk shows which created a sentiment against the government and the army among the people.
From the start of the BDR rebellion, it was seen that the media’s uncontrolled, irresponsible and biased transmission, and the easy availability of contact over mobile phones caused tension in BDR units outside Dhaka.
Preparation for talks and army operation and its risk
12. To quell the rebellion, preparation for an army operation and talks to solve the crisis was continued simultaneously. Though the army and Rab took up their positions around Pilkhana by 12 noon on February 25, they were not completely aware of the situation inside Pilkhana, the number of mutineers, the heavy weapons inside, or the exact location of the hostages. On one hand there was the risk of heavy casualty of civilian lives and property in an armed attack inside the densely populated Pilkhana area. On the other hand there was also a huge risk of the mutineers causing massive loss to the residents of the houses and other installations around Pilkhana. There also remained the risk that if the army operation was conducted without knowledge of the exact location of the hostages, then the mutineers could put the blame of the killings of army officers and their families, arson and looting on the army itself. In such a situation a civil war like situation would have been created in the country. Any army attack to check the rebellion could endanger the internal security of Bangladesh.
The Prime Minister’s address to the nation
13. The prime minister’s address was aired over the state TV and radio at 2:30 pm on February 26. She ordered the rebels to surrender their arms and return to the barracks. She warned them not to compel her to take stern measures against them. Preparations for an army operation was also taken as per the government’s decision in case the mutineers did not surrender their arms by the deadline given to them in the prime minister’s address.
End of mutiny
14. Announcements were made using microphones to people living within the three-kilometre perimeter area adjoining the Pilkhana, asking them to move to safety in order to keep the casualty down during an army drive. The Prime Minister’s speech completely shattered the morale of the rebels. They were compelled to accept all government decisions, as they had no other alternative. The rebels started final surrender of their arms to the home minister at 5:50 pm. Then the police, and the army the following morning, took up full control of Pilkhana.
Flight of the rebels and their accomplices
15. From the first day of the BDR mutiny, mutineers and their family members kept fleeing the Pilkhana premises in different ways. Immediately after the mutiny began at Darbar Hall, many of the BDR members (including officers) had fled Pilkhana.
Most of those who participated in the rebellion fled from Pilkhana during the nights of February 25 and 26 (except for around 200 BDR members). The mutineers mainly scaled the boundary walls on the west side and used gate nos 5 and 2 for their flight. Many abandoned their uniforms, boot etc that were found on the bank of a pond near the boundary wall near Bay Tannery.
Some helpful civilians aided the BDR men to flee by supplying them with clothes, food and water. They were led by former BNP ward commissioner Suraiya Begum, her two sons, local criminals Masud and Leather Liton. Many mutineers used the Keraniganj ferry ghat to flee. Former BNP lawmaker Nasiruddin Ahmed Pintu helped them flee by arranging engine-run boats to cross the river. Rab arrested 76 rebels while they were fleeing.
Rescue of hostages
16. Of the 107 army officials present at Pilkhana on February 25 a total of 50 survived. Of them some managed to flee on the start of the mutiny and the rest were rescued on February 26 from hostage. Though rebellion spread to 34 BDR units outside Dhaka none was killed there. 152 army officer and family members posted there could reach safety. All deputy commissioners and police supers as per government order provided them necessary assistance. They also took over the charge of the armoury of the units. Due to uncertain situation there was some confusion over the number of casualties, which was amended later.
Killings
17. Information received from different sources show that most of the army officers were killed by 11 am on February 25. Of the 57 army officers, 52 were killed in Darbar Hall and adjoining areas, 5 others were killed elsewhere inside the Pilkhana.
Nine BDR members were killed during the mutiny. Central subedar major Nurul Islam was killed at the beginning of the rebellion. Though no specific information is available regarding the death of the other eight BDR men, it is assumed that they were killed in cross fires when they obstructed mutineers. Besides an army soldier and four civilians were killed and about 30 others were injured.
Recovery of the bodies of martyred officials
18. After killing the army officers the rebels tried to hide the bodies. Bodies of two senior officers were disposed inside a manhole. Two bodies were recovered from Kamrangir Char area and bodies of seven other officers were recovered from the mouth of the sluice gate at the sewerage line adjacent to the embankment. A total of 53 bodies of officers and others were recovered from inside Pilkhana, most of them from the mass graves dug by the mutineers. Two bodies recovered have still not been identified.
What is the cause of the mutiny?
19. The real cause and motive behind the barbaric incident could not be established beyond doubt. The committee feels that further investigation is required to unearth the real cause behind the incident. The negative attitude among the general BDR members towards the army officers, and their discontent over unfulfilled demands may be identified as the primary cause of the mutiny. Analysis of these demands give the impression that such small demands can not be the main cause of such a heinous incident. These points have been used to influence the general BDR soldiers. The main conspirators may have used these causes to instigate this incident, they themselves working from behind curtains to destabilise the nation.
Subsidiary causes
19. Some subsidiary causes played direct/indirect role in realisation of the rebellion. These are: failure of the main intelligence agencies, their inefficiency and organisational failures, collusion of the Rifles Security Unit (RSU) with the mutineers, lack of necessary coordination between the BDR and the home ministry regarding the demands, instigation of the different demands of the mutineers by the electronic media and the information ministry’s overall lack of control over the media.
BDR soldiers also carries out rebellions in 1972 and 1991. But due to limitation of BDR laws, those responsible for the mutinies could not be punished and thus those incidents failed to discourage BDR members from carrying out revolts.
Motive of the mutiny
21. The main aim or motive of the mutiny was to destroy chain of command and render the BDR ineffective, discouraging army officers to work in BDR on deputation in future by brutally killing army officers, putting Bangladesh Army and the BDR on a collision course, destabilising the newly elected government, destroying internal security and stability of Bangladesh, tarnishing the image of the country abroad, and hamper the participation of Bangladesh in UN peacekeeping missions.
Long term impact of the incident
22. The mutiny incident is sure to have a long-term impact in Bangladesh. The BDR rebellion, which was a big threat to democracy, posed a huge challenge to the newly elected government. The rebellion was a threat to stability of the nation. The Army lost many meritorious and efficient officers. Their families lost their dear and near ones and the nation was deprived of their service. As an institution BDR was almost destroyed and has lost people’s trust and respect. Overall the army has also been affected. The reputation of Bangladesh Armed Forces earned in the UN Peace Mission also faces a threat. The dent it made on the morale of the armed forces would take time to recover.
Conspirators and their failed attempt
23. Those who do not believe in the independence and sovereignty of the country, those who do not believe in democracy, those who do not want o see Bangladesh as a stable, democratic and developing country, those who does not want Bangladesh to be secure and have a strong armed forces, made an attempt to reach their vile goals by putting the BDR and the army on a collision course through the BDR mutiny. The mutiny was quelled with political sagacity, wisdom and bold leadership.
Recommendations
24. The enquiry committee made some short term and long term recommendations for the government’s consideration and taking effective steps:
Short term recommendations
a) Immediate completion of trial of all crimes related to BDR killings under the laws of the army to ensure quick and exemplary punishment;
b) Immediate restoration of BDR command and control for the sake of national security;
c) Steps for proper honour and rehabilitation of the army officers, and families of those killed and affected in the BDR rebellion;
d) Steps for proper honour and rehabilitation of the family members of those BDR personnel, including central subedar Major Md Nurul Islam, who were killed in resisting the rebellion.
e) Proper compensation to the civilians who were killed and affected.
f) Steps for identification of the unidentified bodies- intensifying attempts to recover looted arms and ammunitions;
g) Arrest and trial of the absconding rebels;
h) Immediate formation of a permanent “National Crisis Management Committee (NCMC) at the highest level to face different national crises.
Long term recommendations
a) Reconstitution of BDR;
b) Redistribution of responsibility and duty of all intelligence agencies and formation of a permanent Central Intelligence Coordination Committee (CICC) at highest level;
c) Formation of counter intelligence forces for all intelligence agencies including the RSU;
d) Amendment and updating the laws and acts concerning BDR and other para military forces including the articles of rules concerning mutiny;
e) Updating the existing laws and rules to ensure proper work environment and facilities in the army, para military and law enforcing agencies;
f) Refixing the service tenure of all members of BDR personnel in line with those of the army;
g) Bringing a balance in the benefits, salaries and allowances of the army, para military and law enforcing agency personnel;
h) Avoiding the involvement of members of the army, para military and law enforcing agencies in programmes such as Operation Daal-Bhat, and instead engaging them in professional duties as far as possible;
i) Formulation of effective policies and fixing strategies for increasing coordination among the army, para military and law enforcing agencies under different ministries including the home ministry;
j) Formulation of necessary Code of Conduct for the media specifying their (print and electronic media) role in consolidating national security;
k) Controlling mobile telephone transmission tower (BTS) in the sensitive areas housing army, para-military and law enforcing agency establishments;
l) Separate enquiry into the irregularities in Daal-Bhat programme, BDR shop, Kalyan Trust, School Management, contracting etc;
m) Strict ban on any kind of persuasion in appointments in army, para military and law enforcing agencies, considering qualification as the only yardstick for such appointments and a departmental enquiry to find out and take action against those who were appointed in such ways;
n) Arranging more investigations to identify the main persons responsible for the BDR rebellion.
No mention of the deaths in custody of the BDR personnel in the recommendations while of course there is mention of more control over the media and monitoring of cell phones. This report seems to have been made by one person sitting in front of a PC. The agenda is blatantly obvious.
[Reply]
Every body highlights important aspect like the way UV did as well. I would like to add one that catches my attention for now. :
“Media’s negative role
11. From the start of the incident, private TV channels spread the news of the mutiny at home and abroad through live telecasts. In doing so, they gave preference to the commercial aspects pf the situation over the national security. Where different intelligence agencies, the army and the government itself could not get details form inside the Pilkhana, mutineers in Dhaka and outside of Dhaka were able to get detailed news regarding the position of army and other on goings inside the Pilkhana thanks to the media. In general, the media encouraged the mutineers by publicising the news about the mutiny, and talk shows which created a sentiment against the government and the army among the people.
From the start of the BDR rebellion, it was seen that the media’s uncontrolled, irresponsible and biased transmission, and the easy availability of contact over mobile phones caused tension in BDR units outside Dhaka.”
In UV as well we have seen few initial mindless comments by heartless commentators with subtle and not so subtle observation.
However, Rumi’s sensible blog was a sensible check.
[Reply]
I congratulate the government for bringing out the report. No government in the past has ever done it.
This is indeed a positive development. The contents are free, fair and impartial. Healthy democracy has started bearing fruit for us.
[Reply]
Hana, I think you got it wrong in terms of “terms of reference” or mandate of the investigation. The team was to investigate the reasons for mutiny and related issue till it happened and how possibly it was handled.
Now the deaths of BDR started after that and if I am not wrong, govt / BDR initiated a investigation on that. The outcome of those can be debated but not under this. Having said that I agree with you I am not totally satisfied with the report. In fact 100% will never be satisfied in a country of ours as partisan as it is.
As for media, media’s role after/during the mutiny was very dangerous that media has also accepted. Those who have slightest idea of how to handle such situation can’t help but wonder what the hell was media doing broadcasting BDR versions of facts and live telecasting, at least the preparation of armed forces. Afterall, if an operation would have been inevitable like PM warned, surprise and secrecy is of paramount importance for success of any military intervention. By livecasting location, preparation media did eveything but help.
So lets accept media needs to have a code of conduct if tom dick and harry like us are all bound by some sort of code of conduct. Freedom of speech does not call for freedom to do anything and every thing at will. Even in this blog, many called for moderation of comments as is sensible.
[Reply]
WE ARE UNFORTUNATE
The investigation report was a chance for the nation to stand unitedely against the foreign conspirators once again after 1971. We have lost the opportunity. The carnage was so designed that leaves all the possibility to destroy Bangladesh with a short blow in an opportune moment. Almost similar things happened repeatedly in Bangladesh since 1971 in 1975 (15 Aug, 03 Nov), 1981 and many times later. Unfortunately all the times we ourselves were the player with every incident. BDR personals who are directly or indirectly involved with the carnage are not the key players but our intelligent home made masters could be so convinced fuelling the so called grievances which resulted to happen this historic massacre.
The series of make ups before and after the incident tells how cheap we are to our foreign masters who can play with our fortune leaving us every time in uncertainty and in divisions.
In exchange of what I afraid Govt’s own people solely could convince them to be involved so direly with the incident without at all foreseeing the consequences. The causes are very clear and our own people behind the game are also by now identified but we are afraid of whom to surface them? Remember, the foreign evils keep these scope of assurance hiding the facts to exploit for future, may be you go away from your own land to prevent hands from law will not be enough to safe you from ‘their’(?) hands to pull you back under their future game plan as happening now. We get blind when in power thus thinks there is no future or nature does not take its own course!
It would be better if facts would be surfaced and a means to address them involved as the mastermind directly/in-directly would be arranged. How much the Govt would be accepted to people, to the victims’ associates, to them whose bleeding will not end and how the odd people trying to play politics would be sized – we never take account of these. May be the language of politics is so cruel it does not consider straight path. There may be danger that Govt falls, way of journey becomes toughest – not accepted.
This is not the way you give lesson to your own men in uniform for ever! Nothing prevails as forever, there is something after. There you had all the power in hand to try them; it was enough with your minimum authority to fix them for their unjustified odds off course those only who offended you. Some of them were offended, they were utilized in the past against you, you are after them now and they will be again after you – how long these will continue? Odds have their ever true reaction surely to take place in course of time- in the perspective of our country it are the foreign evils which will ensure the course to appear in their right (?) time. Who wins at the end not you or your people – the foreign monsters whom you call your masters and do all out to please them to fulfill their evil desires at the cost of your nation’s/country’s/peoples’/independence/sovereignty’s interest. Finally you invite a situation no lesser than Pakistan, Afghanistan.
ALO
[Reply]
I think this Govt. is failing in two areas. A. Inter-ministerial coordination and B. Press handling
See today’s contradictory comments by two ministers on the demand (by the opposition) of forming an all-party parliamentary investigation team. Not that this is new or BNP has asked this with all good intention but I think Govt seems to be quite nervous to think how to address that. For some reasons, I feel this BDR mutiny is getting to be a big pain for this government and with less coordination and press disasters one after another, this may eventually become a gangrene for them.
[Reply]
Ms Hana Ahmed,
Ir-respective of what ever recommendations are made or otherwise regarding the Media or the Cell Phone monitorings by the rhetorics in the BDR Probe Report, end result is a mega naught. Last 2 days media coverage of criminals; Daud Merchant & Zahid Sheikh crystal clearly proves this fact as, these criminals were literally made Heroes by our media, instead of making them squat on all fours or spread eagle flat on their backs!!! As recently shown on BBC by how British Police treats terrorists criminals, during their recent crack-down on Pak students suspects in UK!
When will our cops & media ensure & learn that, terrorists criminals are not wittingly or un-wittingly to be made fundamentalist Heroes!!!
Ricky
[Reply]
“The committee feels that further investigation is required to unearth the real cause behind the incident.”
Apart from this honest statement in Paragraph 19, this report is absolutely useless. If the media was to blame for hyping up the discontent among the “deprived” mutineers, the “corruption” of BDR high-ups, and the Anti-army sentiment, the government has just that one more time. Except this time citizens of this country will not believe what is being said. To call this a mutiny and trying to highlight the causes of it (luxurious lifestyle of the chiefs and so on) is not only disrespectful to all the lives that were lost, but is blatantly untrue. It was planned murder and it should go down in history as planned murder.
What a bunch of convenient lies!
[Reply]
media wouldnt make religious criminals heroes, they portay them as dumbo cavemen. Dave Merchant and picchi hannan have secular (sorry, noncommunal), bollywood stylings that make them stand out.
mahmood mamdani, and afro-asian scholar and commentator has been talking recently about the western ‘humanitarian’ need to make heroes and villians out of subtle situations. he refers to darfur. its wrong.
[Reply]
“19. The real cause and motive behind the barbaric incident could not be established beyond doubt.”
—
If we cannot establish the perpetrators of an event 3 months old, with digital cameras and CCTV hooked up for Scotland Yard and Interpol to study, then what hope do we have for events 38 years old (71 war crimes) when all we had were sticks and stones ??
Maybe its time for us to give up the business of probes and ‘trials’, and use that 500 crore taka “Trials Money” to establish a ‘fool-proof’ CID technology and ANTI-CRIMES Bureau for the nation instead !!
Unless, after 5 years we will be happy to say “the real ‘criminals’ behind the barbaric incident could not be established beyond doubt.”
[Reply]
The report has little value in the eyes of law. It was not a judicial commission. Terms of reference unknown. Time will tell what interest it has served. The report is self contradictory :
19. “19. The real cause and motive behind the barbaric incident could not be established beyond doubt.”
23. Those who do not believe in the independence and sovereignty of the country, those who do not believe in democracy, those who do not want o see Bangladesh as a stable, democratic and developing country, those who does not want Bangladesh to be secure and have a strong armed forces, made an attempt to reach their vile goals by putting the BDR and the army on a collision course through the BDR mutiny.
How have they concluded this as a mutiny or rebellion ?? A per para 23. it’s a conspiracy.
Why try under army acts ? Were they tasked to recommend that ?
They couldn’t figure out what it was , but has ample ideas as recommendations. Probably that’s what it was for , making only recommendations !! We may never hear the truth.
[Reply]